its true that natgate this time and ataims have a lot in common. but the only difference is hall accussed ataims directly, i don't remember whether ataims denied it immediately last time, but things turned out that the accusation somehow is true according to the western high esg standard (but not necessary true according to our industry practice, its quite common here).

this time, natgate denied it immediately with concrete argument that it was the other end user party who did it (though didnt name it). neither us nor singapore authority counter natgate's argument, neither are they taking any action on natgate yet. all in all, the accusation was not pointing towards natgate at all, until this time it is just rumor in natgate's side. this is the big difference between ataims and natgate. in the end, only time will tell.

i didnt mean to defend natgate for whatever reason. its just that, you brought up an interesting point about the similarity between ataims and natgate. this triggered my interest. i tried to use this opportunity to review and debate it within myself.

If this is accusation without justification against Nationgate, surely it will recover in future. I am still observing this stock, given that many much movement in stock markets are driven by irrational emotion. Also, one thing to consider buying this stock is, as of today 11th March 2025, US big giant tech stock is tumbling and it shows the sign of non stop declining as Mr President Trump's recent statement that he mention it is transition period undergoing. Just careful for now.

If you are the insider, will you release those tide at Rm3? Just like top glove, not possible to let those tide up with Rm15 go. If you let them go, you need to go another higher high. All is just money game.