Our website is made possible by displaying non-intrusive online advertisements to our visitors.
Please consider supporting us by disabling or pausing your ad blocker.
the case is baseless , frivolous no case at all
nevertheless it boils down to bad management ,self-interest totally disregard the interest of minority shareholders ,shame on them
company has no progressive dividend policy
who can propose that company be resolved that at least 40% of its annual net profit be distributed as dividend to shareholders
the prospect of company is good but it is greatly outweighed by the self-interest totally disregard the interest of shareholders by the top management in this respect they have siphoned off tons of cash of the company for investments overseas at the expense of the company such long term investmen will only benefit the top management"s.grand children
fair or not fair is a question
to accept offer or not is dilemma , to accept , the feeling of being shortchanged is troubling not to accept the risk of becoming shareholder of an delisted company is frustrating , you have to accept the fact they are master of the fate of your investment
A company's net assets value has no bearing on its market price nor it would reflect to certain extent it's market price and or value unless the said company is being liquidated to realise it's net assets value or to dispose of its assets for cash and to distribute to shareholders in the form of dividend or bonus issue to shareholders esp mulpha nta is 11",00 it's market price is 2,39 Tan chong it's nta 4,00 the prevailing market price is 2,39 ntv has no impact on market price
